Got an idea?

Please, tell us how we can make ATAS the best platform for you. Vote for other users' ideas.

RTH/ETH sessions + indicators like internals

Hello, I find ATAS is a really good platform but it could improve a few things really easy, mostly as as a futures platform how is it possible that I can't have one window with RTH and another with ETH? You can actually change the time of a certain product to only see RTH at exchange settings but then you won't be able to see the entire ETH session on any other window, You can also change the settings with an open window to RTH but then you get a huge space with nothing which makes it really unuseful. Will that be change in the future? I think it's something really simple to do and that most of the day traders here will thank you for. Then in the future adding indicators like market internals, actually $ADSPD is the one I use, I think a lot of traders use it now to and have to go to other platforms to do so...

An Anonymous User about 2 months ago

4

Noted

💡 Feature Request

74

Cross-trade instruments using the copy trade module

It would be nice to have the option to cross-trade instruments using the copy trade module. For instance, if I long ES in the parent account, the child account will long MES with lot size according to the set ratio in the module. Or, for instance, if I long ES in the parent account, then the child account will short NQ etc.This one may be impossible to program reliably, but it would be amazing. It would be extremely convenient to have the ability to alternate executions across multiple accounts. For instance, if I want to scale into 10 contracts across 10 accounts instead of concentrating all of that risk into one account. Every time I add contracts on the parent account, it will cycle those executions through each child account. The first contract long will execute in one account, then the next contract gets executed in the next account and so on. When I scale out, it will scale out in each account sequentially. If I add 5 contracts, it will spread those 5 contracts out across 5 accounts.

Rafik about 1 month ago

5

💡 Feature Request

65

Watch list, trading volume for 24 hours in USDT($) and price change for 24 hours in %

Уважаемые разработчики, огромная просьба, усовершенствовать вочлист, добавить:1. Обьем торгов в USDT ($) за сутки (24 часа).2. Изменение цены в % за сутки (24 часа).Данные опции предоставляет сама биржа, но не удобно сначала фильтровать на бирже, потом открывать АТАС, хочется просто открыть АТАС и быть в курсе где выросли обьемы и какие монеты сильно изменились в цене. ВАЖНО, предоставлять обьем именно в $ ибо стоимость монет разная, следовательно обьемы монет разные и в любом случае ты пересчитываешь это в $, чтобы сравнить вливания с другими монетами и понять куда $ влито больше, следовательно, где больше  интерес.... Прилагаю картинку, чтобы вы поняли, что сообщество просит добавитьКак и говорил ранее, эти данные есть в самой бирже и думаю добавить на платформу будет проще. Будем ждать, спасибо!

An Anonymous User about 2 months ago

1

Noted

💡 Feature Request

65

Editable Indicators in Atas (like Pinescript)

I think it would be a great idea to make indicators easily editable and importable by making them open source and having a script editor implemented in Atas (like pinescript for tradingview) so users can write their own indicators, or modify existing indicators and tweak them.Maybe also a good idea to make the language the same as pinescript so that you can import your own indicators (as Tradingview is the most popular and has the biggest custom indicator library)In addition it would also be nice to be able to create multiple templates for indicators, for example a template for dark mode where the line is white, and a template for white mode were the line is black.

Pjotr 30 days ago

7

💡 Feature Request

60

In Progress

Create ATAS for MAC (OS X) / Создать ATAS для MAC (OS X)

Mac is one of the most used systems and its reliability, is much higher than Windows, I think it would be great to be able to use ATAS natively in MAC OS In windows, the CPU consumption is very high, I think that by the way MAC would be more efficient.Thank youSee also my other suggestion:https://support.orderflowtrading.ru/communities/1/topics/21856-session-level-with-parametersMac - одна из наиболее часто используемых систем, и ее надежность намного выше, чем у Windows. Думаю, было бы здорово иметь возможность использовать ATAS в MAC OS X.В Windows потребление процессора очень высокое, я думаю, что, кстати, MAC будет более эффективным.СпасибоСмотрите также мое другое предложение:https://support.orderflowtrading.ru/communities/1/topics/21856-session-level-with-parameters

An Anonymous User about 2 months ago

4

💡 Feature Request

48

In Progress

Quick Stop Loss to Entry (Breakeven)

I've asked support and this is not currently available so was hoping it could be implemented.My trading style using LTF can sometimes mean I'm catching fast moves to TP1 and then out at entry. I use a multiple TP strategy to maximise profit if the move should breakout further.However, the problem I face is that moving my SL to entry to breakeven after TP1 can sometimes cause a loss as I'm not fast enough to move it manually.It would be great if the strategy was updated so that an option was added to allow upon hitting TP1 (using the Multiple SL &TP strategy) the SL would move to breakeven. This would allow for a true set and forget trade strategy.Failing this a hotkey to shift your SL to entry instantly would also help greatly improve the speed of making this change.Thanks,Charles

Charles Hurst 27 days ago

4

💡 Feature Request

37

With modified sizes to effective success

With modified sizes to effective successHello dear ATAS team,First of all, thank you for your innovative ideas. With ATAS you have created a platform that allows professional traders an unlimited number of filter settings to achieve their goals. Of course there are also some bugs, but you immediately try to fix these bugs. Today I would like to present you an idea that will show many ATAS traders the exact turning points in the chart in the future.A market is determined by supply and demand and the price moves because the market sell orders (point A) run into the limit buy orders (point B) and the market buy orders (point C) run into the limit sell orders (point D). The iceberg orders are hidden behind the limit orders and can, if necessary, be pushed by the big player algorithms to absorb further market orders. These facts are well known. The first level of limit buy orders in the DoM represents the best bid. The first level of limit sell orders in the DoM represents the best ask. The spread lies between the best ask and the best bid. This spread changes if no further limit orders are added after a current price. This creates small or larger gaps, which in most cases are not visible because they take place inside a candle. In the bid and ask area, there are different movements that must be considered separately. If point A is stronger than point B, the market sell orders break through the limit buy orders and if point C is weaker than point B, the market buy orders are absorbed and stopped by the limit sell orders. I have described these different strengths in more detail here:Which is stronger, market orders or limit orders?https://www.forexfactory.com/showthread.php?p=12885755#post12885755With the help of the different filter settings from ATAS, I was able to color-code these strengths.The strength of the market orders is easy to identify, but the strength of the limit orders is not. The sizes you listed in the Times and Sales list have a special ability to display the strength of limit orders. However, the view of the sizes in the Times and Sales list must be optimized. Here is an example from 07/02/2020 from the Euro FX.Equilibrium (Point A) was formed over a period of 30 minutes. A horizontal limit delta was formed in this equilibrium, where a higher number of limit sell orders were displayed (point B). The vertical limit delta also shows a higher volume of limit sell orders (point C). From this it could be concluded that the price will continue to go down. The problem is getting the right time to not be stopped. At point E we can see in the sizes that on the best ask side, higher than average numbers appear than on the best bid side. The numbers best bid / best ask show the limit orders still available in the DoM after each trade. In this case, smaller iceberg orders were pushed in on the sell limit side, which held up all market buy orders. After that, the price went down 16 ticks (point D). With the presentation of the current sizes you can hardly identify that, because the numbers run down very quickly.With the help of a small graphic with bar display (Point A) it clearer. One can immediately see that the limit sell side is holding the market orders, after that, the price is running in the opposite direction (point B).In the ATAS DoM I calculated the respective equilibrium from the sizes (blue fields) (Point A). At Point B you can see my suggestion to better highlight the sizes. In this case, the maximum size of the bars was limited to 100. One should be able to set this size yourself, as numbers over 100 can also occur. In the area of ​​the sizes there should also be the possibility to separate Best Bid and Best Ask from each other (Point C and D). This is crucial if you have Ask and Bid displayed separately in the Times and Sales list. In addition, there should be the option of expanding the field of sizes to show the display even more precisely. I also recommend a color filter setting to highlight certain values ​​in the area of ​​the sizes.Conclusion:The display of a bar graph in the area of ​​the sizes brings enormous advantages in the identification of trend reversals. You can immediately see when strong limit orders are holding the market orders at multiple price levels. In addition, you can see the strength of both limit sides at all times. Absorptions at different price levels can be identified even faster. The sizes enable other interesting aspects, such as the specific identification of iceberg orders. I also have a few ideas that make it easier for us traders to get an overview. The big players have a clear advantage over retail traders thanks to their iceberg orders. According to a study, 70% of iceberg orders are between 10-20 lots in size and are used permanently. These iceberg orders can be identified with the right tools. The stock exchange data is available for this, we just have to make it visible.The DoM can also be filtered in order to obtain even more precise information about the iceberg orders. In this example you can see my modified DoM. I will be happy to publish further ideas if necessary. I hope that my idea of ​​sizes gets some likes from the ATAS Traders, so that we can pinpoint the trend reversals in the future.Best regards Michael

An Anonymous User about 2 months ago

💡 Feature Request

36

indicator Grouping (Show /Hide Group of multi Indicator) + Custom Naming

Organization and management of indicators on charts. This proposal aims to provide users with a more efficient way to group and categorize installed indicators, as well as the ability to customize indicator names for better clarity and concise visualization.Current Situation:Presently, users often find themselves installing multiple instances of the same indicator to cater to various timeframes or preferences. This practice can lead to a cluttered chart view, making it challenging to quickly access relevant information and maintain a clean workspace. The lack of grouping options further compounds this issue and the long name same name current format creates further confusion if multiple installs of market profile, vwap etc are used with long names exactly the same.Proposed Solution:1. Indicator Grouping: Introduce a feature that enables users to create folders or groups to organize their installed indicators. For example, if a user has multiple VWAP indicators for different timeframes, they can group them under a common folder called "VWAP." These groups can be toggled to hide or show on the chart, ensuring a clean and focused display.2. Custom Indicator Naming: Provide users with the ability to customize the names of their installed indicators. This customization could involve adding prefixes, abbreviations, or other descriptive elements to indicator names. For instance, a user could rename a VWAP indicator for daily, weekly, and monthly timeframes as "D.VWAP," "W.VWAP," and "M.VWAP" respectively. This empowers users to quickly identify the purpose of each indicator instance.Benefits of the Proposed Changes:- Enhanced Chart Organization: Users can group related indicators together, reducing clutter and providing a more streamlined chart view.- Quick Access: Indicator grouping enables users to toggle visibility of specific indicator categories, allowing them to focus on relevant information.- Customized Indicator Names: Users can customize indicator names to convey their purpose succinctly, facilitating easier interpretation of their charts.- Improved Workspace: With the ability to hide or show indicator groups, users can maintain a cleaner workspace without sacrificing essential information.Application Scenarios Examples:- Market Profile: Organize various Market Profile indicators (e.g., daily, weekly, monthly) into it's own distinct groups. (Market Profiles)- Moving Averages: Group different Moving Averages based on timeframes or calculation methods into their own group folder- Pivot Points: Categorize Pivot Point indicators by session or calculation method.-vWAPS/tWAPSUsers that have multiple instances installed could now rename long names into shorts named and put them in an indicators folder to show / hide that group. And so on for multiple installations of the same indicatorConclusion:This enhancement proposal aims to empower users with better control over their charts' visual clutter and the ability to quickly access to show/hide in a group clearly named relevant information. By introducing indicator grouping and customized naming, ATAS can offer a more user-friendly and organized trading environment.

Gregor about 1 month ago

2

💡 Feature Request

34